Working brief
Decisions to settle before approval
The right architecture balances latency, privacy, recurring service cost, update behavior, offline use, content scale and component cost. The purpose of this page is to make the buyer's next decision explicit and give the project team a shared review point before cost, tooling or production commitments.
- Offline requirements
- Response latency target
- Data and parental-control assumptions
- Update and service model
What the review should return
A useful review does more than confirm that the project is possible. It records the assumptions, files, risks and approvals that control the next milestone.
- Architecture comparison
- Connectivity decision
- Power and cost assumptions
- Privacy questions for counsel
Evidence buyers should request
These items prevent the page from becoming a generic marketing claim. They should be current, relevant to this product decision and available for review at the appropriate project stage.
- Block diagrams
- Latency tests
- Power budget
- Service dependency list
How this fits the project
Latency, privacy, power, connectivity, acoustic performance and update behavior all compete for space and cost. The first engineering review forces those tradeoffs into the open. For this decision, the team should confirm ownership, reviewers and exit criteria before moving to the next stage.
The downloadable or emailed plan records working assumptions only. Final engineering, quotation, compliance, intellectual-property and schedule commitments belong in the reviewed project scope and signed agreement.